J.A.I.L. News Journal
March 25, 2006
(By Ron Branson)
Inherent truth supersedes every charge or
argument that may be laid against it, because it is -- inherent truth!
Inherent truth exists whether or not anyone believes or agrees with it. It
just is -- "inherent truth!" It is irrelevant whether
anyone is confused over what inherent truth is. They will either learn to
abide by inherent truth or suffer the consequences.
There has never been a time in which inherent
truth did not exist, but there certainly has been a time when men did not
understand inherent truth. Inherent truth is not invented; it can only be
discovered. For instance, was there a time when there were neither judges
nor courts? Of course! And before there existed laws or courts, there
existed murder. Just because there existed neither laws nor courts, did this
absence render murder acceptable? Of course not! Why? Merely because
murder defies inherent truth, aside from the existence or non-existence of
laws and courts!
In due time, it seemed only reasonable that
men should establish among themselves judges and courts to adjudicate claims
for the purpose of bringing about justice. "Justice," therefore, is inherent
truth! But what if the law became perverted by special interests and
was interpreted to plunder the rights of one for the personal benefit of
another? For instance, in the recent Kelo v. New London decision, 125 S.Ct.
2655, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that it is "just" to take away the
private property of "A" by "law" and give it to "B" for the latter's
special interests. Again, like murder, such pronouncement defies inherent
truth whether sanctioned by "law" or not!
The U.S. Supreme Court is not the final
determiner of inherent truth; rather, it is inherent truth that is the
determinant of the Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court is consistent with
inherent truth, its determination is right. On the other hand, if the
Supreme Court determination is inconsistent with inherent truth, it is
wrong. Any other reasoning makes the justices of the Supreme Court gods, and
If it be agreed that these justices are not
gods, and that they are indeed men subject to human error and the influence
of special interests, or even willful misconduct, to whom shall society
appeal for the inherent truth of justice? Remember, justice, being inherent
truth, is not an option. If everyone on the face of this planet opposed
"justice," would "justice" cease to be inherent truth? No! It would simply
mean that everyone on planet earth was wrong.
Was there a time before there existed citizen
juries? Certainly! Yet, before juries were physically manifested, juries
have been, and are nonetheless,
"inherent truth!" Inherent truth has no
beginning; it always is, even before it is discovered. There exists but only
a time at which such inherent truth is discovered, such as with juries. Our
Founding Fathers were enlightened as to this inherent truth, and penned it
down firmly in our Constitution with the words, "The trial of all crimes,
except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury..." Article III, Sec. 2,
clause 3. In the late 1960s, beginning in California, legislators around the
country began to "legislate away" the inherent truth of juries in the name
of "infractions." Therefore, infractions defy inherent truth.
Interesting is the fact that all artificial
"laws" defying inherent truth must be propped up with many other
truth-defying laws. However laws that are consistent with inherent truth are
self-evident, which goes without saying. Who enforces the law of gravity?
Who enforces the law of centrifugal force? Who enforces the law of
aerodynamics? or death? Inherent truth ignores the devices of evil men, and
goes on being -- inherent truth! Men come and go, but inherent truth remains
firm. It may be opposed, but never defeated. No man can defeat inherent
truth whether or not that inherent truth has yet been discovered, because it
is -- inherent truth!
Beyond trial juries, our Founding Fathers
were further enlightened as to the inherent truth of Grand Juries. The
Associated Press, on February 15, 2006, in an article written by Chet
Brokaw, "Senate Panel calls for defeat of ballot measure on judges" states
these words, "Schoenbeck said Ron Branson, the California man who started
the judicial accountability movement, is mistaken in his belief that a grand
jury should be the top power in government."
These words from Senator Schoenbeck in
opposition to J.A.I.L. are interesting in view of the Fifth Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution, "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or
otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand
Some states do not have Grand Juries. So
how can such states hold anyone to answer for a capitol or felony offense
committed within their state? Constitutionally, they can't. Translated, this
means that anyone can be a mass murderer in such state and never be held to
answer for their crime. All power and jurisdiction over such crimes rests
purely with the Grand Jury. But in those states, there are none.
While no prosecutor, attorney general,
governor or president has jurisdiction to act in such cases, a Grand Jury
does exclusively. This may come as a shock to many of you, but this is
precisely what the U.S. Constitution mandates to all states. In the absence
of a Grand Jury, anyone can literally get away with murder. But murder is
wrong and cannot be tolerated. It violates inherent truth.
Now in light of the U.S. Constitution, let's
revisit South Dakota Senator Schoenbeck's statement, "Ron Branson, the
California man who started the judicial accountability movement, is mistaken
in his belief that a grand jury should be the top power in government." Not
only should Grand Juries be the top power, but
they are the top power over government.
They have the exclusive power to do what no other entity within government
can do, including the U.S. Supreme Court.
South Dakota annunciates inherent truth in
its Constitution, Article VI, Sec. 26, which states, "All political power is
inherent in the people, and all free government is founded on their
authority..." But what if some, including all of their own legislators, did
not agree with this inherent truth? They are wrong!
For instance, a few days ago, March 20, 2006,
to be specific, the "Insurance Journal" that claims to represent 1,400
insurance companies nationwide, in an article titled, "National Insurer
Group Opposes S.D. Judicial Ballot Initiative" states, "Schmelzer added that
stopping the South Dakota effort is an essential step in discouraging
similar initiatives in other states that permit citizens to amend their
constitutions by direct election." In other words, an overwhelming number of
insurance companies in the U.S., through the voice of their representation,
are seeking to defeat the immutable inherent truth
that "All political power is inherent in the people."
These identified subversive insurance companies associated with NAMIC
(National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies)
around the nation are banding together
to overthrow the People's inherent right nationwide to the initiative
process by which they may vote as they deem proper for their future
security. These companies seek to overthrow the inalienable rights of the
American People to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, "That to
secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their
just powers from the consent of the governed..." Declaration of
Bottom line, the South Dakota J.A.I.L.
Amendment (Amendment E) is self-evident inherent truth as it is also to
every state in this nation. Just because our Founding Fathers did not see in
their day the inherent truth of J.A.I.L. does not make it any less
Inherent Truth. J.A.I.L., as a means of protecting life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, has just recently come to light in
America 200 years after our Founding Fathers established our Constitution;
but in their day, J.A.I.L. was yet inherent truth that only now
has become self-evident. It can never be defeated.
There is no Army on earth that can defeat
inherent truth any more than Congress can, with all its power, revoke the
law of gravity. Regardless of the millions spent to defeat it, the inherent
truth of J.A.I.L. is here to stay! Even were it
possible that the opponents of South Dakota J.A.I.L. would succeed in
deceiving the S.D. voters with millions of bucks this November 7th, in due
time J.A.I.L. shall rise again to present itself as self-evident
inherent truth. America's future demands it! It cannot be
On our website,
www.jail4judges.org are the words
in animation, "J.A.I.L. will surely one day be on the lips of everyone from
Sea to shining Sea."
here). There is no mind or authority that can conjure a way to declare
J.A.I.L. as non-inherent truth! And even if it were so declared, it would
still be -- inherent truth! Should there ever arise
any attempt to call J.A.I.L. something else, it will still remain -- inherent
truth! Its precepts cannot and will not be defeated.
Vote YES on Amendment E!